Minute Mysteries [Detectograms] Chapter 1: Part 1

MINUTE MYSTERIES [_Detectograms_] BY H. A. RIPLEY WITH A FOREWORD BY LEWIS E. LAWES _Warden of Sing Sing Prison_ BOSTON AND NEW YORK HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY _The Riverside Press Cambridge_ 1932 COPYRIGHT, 1932, BY HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO REPRODUCE THIS BOOK OR PARTS THEREOF IN ANY FORM The Riverside Press CAMBRIDGE · MASSACHUSETTS PRINTED IN THE U.S.A. TO MY MOTHER FOREWORD The solution of criminal mysteries constitutes one of the most absorbing, possibly the most intriguing forms of mental activity existent. It calls for something more than mere cold intelligence and reasoning ability, requiring in addition native perception, intuition, and a natural understanding of human behavior under stress of emotion and passion. Furthermore, some knowledge of pathological or abnormal behaviorism is a requisite. Mr. Ripley’s excellently thought-out series of mysteries might be said to represent a very adequate cross-section of the problems perennially confronting the law-enforcers and official crime-solvers of the nation. The points of evidence are cleverly assembled and the _nuances_ of incrimination are very subtly shaded. It would be well for the reader interested in successfully solving these problems to endeavor to think, not as a detective, but as the criminal in the case would think, in order to arrive at a correct solution. I have found that to deal adequately with the criminal after conviction, and while in confinement, it is necessary to understand his personal problems. To accomplish this, one must first think as does the criminal, discover the sequent conclusions upon which he based his anti-social activities, and thereupon make use of these findings to assist him toward rehabilitation. In this novel challenge to amateur criminologists, who suffer from a dearth of laboratory specimens upon which to experiment, Mr. Ripley offers an excellent opportunity—that of examining and forming conclusions upon the more elemental, vital, and dramatic aspects of various typical criminal situations, without the drawback of fantasy and concocted sordidness, which, for the practical criminologist, takes the glamour and color out of this thing called—Crime. Lewis E. Lawes AUTHOR’S PREFACE Chief Inspector Kelley, that grizzled veteran of the Detective Bureau, was talking to his nephew, Jim Barry, who had indicated a desire to enter the uncrowded field of criminology. ‘The average policeman,’ he said, ‘looks upon the lay criminologist in much the same manner as the professional in any field regards the amateur. Generally speaking, that attitude is justified. ‘In thirty years of police work, however, I have met no one in detective circles, in or out of the force, who so effectively combines theoretical knowledge with practical application as Professor Fordney. ‘A man of definite scientific attainments and recognition, he yet appreciates that the simple fundamentals of crime detection are effective in ninety per cent of all criminal cases. While he has unraveled by scientific means some amazing and extremely baffling crimes that otherwise would have gone unsolved, he puts his greatest reliance on those basic principles upon which rests the whole structure of crime detection. ‘His major theory is that most crimes are simple; that their solution calls only for the exercise of ordinary talents developed to an extraordinary degree; that the stupidity of the average criminal himself, and not the brilliance of the detective, is responsible for his detection. ‘In that, I might tell you, he finds complete corroboration in the experience of such an outstanding detective of world-wide reputation as Sir Melville L. Macnaghten, C.B., late Chief of the Criminal Investigation Department of Scotland Yard. Commenting on the capture of a particularly vicious murderer, he remarked, “But for the fact that the student of criminal history is constantly faced with the stupidity of the criminal, there would be nothing more remarkable in this case than the fatuity of the man who, having murdered solely for personal gratifications, and taken every precaution, as he thought, to avoid discovery, immediately wrote blackmailing letters in which he showed guilty knowledge of a secret murder.” ‘Fordney could undoubtedly explain such an inconsistency as this by his uncanny knowledge of criminal psychology,’ continued Kelley. ‘Among psychologists his insight into the criminal mind and its reactions is appreciated as being authoritative. ‘His greatest interest is his class in criminology at the University. He still finds time, however, to assist actively the police of many cities who frequently consult him on cases they find unusually puzzling. ‘There are instances also in which his part has been that of a bystander, where a word of suggestion, modestly given, has frequently disposed of cases before they were brought to the attention of the police. ‘If the Professor is convinced you have the natural qualifications, Jim, and a real inclination for work, I can get you into his class. He will take not only a personal, but a fatherly, interest in you, as in the rest of his students. You will receive the finest possible training given by a man of broad understanding and great human sympathies. Out of his vast experience and knowledge, gained in studying crime in all parts of the world, he will develop in you those qualities essential to success in this field. ‘You will find him a genial, ruddy, kindly man of fifty, with a waistline of forty. There is nothing subtle in his face or manner. A characterful nose rises above a strong and determined mouth, adorned by a blond mustache. A pair of keen but smiling blue eyes completes a commonplace face. Although he refuses to admit it, his rapidly thinning hair causes him great concern. A bit vain, the old codger, but don’t tell him I told you so,’ laughed the Inspector. ‘Scrupulously dressed, he looks like an amiable and highly successful business executive. He’s a mixer and thoroughly enjoys the good things of life. He views the passing parade with a keen sense of humor, few illusions, and a genuine interest in his fellow man. Detests hypocrisy; would rather see ten guilty men acquitted than one innocent man condemned. Recognizes his own fallibility, but knows his own worth and does not suffer from that abominable social vice, false modesty. ‘You might be interested in knowing his only hobby is that of designing, making, and repairing toys for children. He’s known to hundreds of them as the Toy Man. ‘Though a bachelor, he looks with favor on the ladies, enjoys their company and is thoroughly sociable. ‘It’s a pleasure and an education to know him. More than once he’s helped your old uncle and absolutely refused the credit that was his,’ concluded Inspector Kelley. In the following pages you will find some interesting experiences taken from the Professor’s case book. They illustrate forcibly his contention that crime is simple and that most criminals are caught, not by any superhuman qualities of the detective, but by their own ignorance, stupidity, or carelessness. In these accounts every fact, every clue necessary to the solution is given. The answer is in the story itself. You need look nowhere else but there. Each problem has only one possible solution. Written in less than two hundred and sixty words, these little stories can be read in a minute. Here is your chance to work on an absolute equality with the Professor; to match your wits with his and the criminal’s. You know as much as the Professor does. Now you have an opportunity of proving just how good a detective you are and what poor detectives your friends are. The author hopes you will find them as fascinating reading as they were in the telling by the Professor. H. A. Ripley CONTENTS Foreword by Lewis E. Lawes vii Author’s Preface ix It Stands to Reason! _A New National Game_ xix 1. A Crack Shot 1 2. On the Scent 3 3. Fatal Error 5 4. The Poison Murder Case 7 5. A Strange ‘Kidnaping’ 9 6. A Valuable Formula 11 7. Strangled 13 8. Death in the Office 15 9. They Usually Forget Something 17 10. The Professor Gives a Lesson 19 11. Upstairs and Down 21 12. Class Day 23 13. A Hot Pursuit 25 14. A Question of Identity 27 15. A Yachtsman’s Alibi 29 16. Murder at Coney Island 31 17. Too Clever 33 18. Bloody Murder 35 19. Death Back-Stage 37 20. An Easy Combination 39 21. A Modern Knight 41 22. The Jewel Robbery 43 23. Before the Coroner’s Inquest 45 24. The Fifth Avenue Hold-Up 47 25. Behind Locked Doors 49 26. Lost at Sea 51 27. A Suave Gunman 53 28. Accidental Death 55 29. Easy Money 57 30. Robbery at High Noon 59 31. The Wrong Foot Forward 61 32. Death Attends the Party 63 33. No Way Out 65 34. Midnight Murder 67 35. Speakeasy Stick-Up 69 36. Behind Time 71 37. A Broken Engagement 73 38. The Holden Road Murder 75 39. Fisherman’s Luck 77 40. The Unlucky Elephant 79 41. The Professor Listens 81 42. Ten-Fifteen 83 43. Rapid Transit 85 44. The Professor is Disappointed 87 45. A Dramatic Triumph 89 46. Murder at the Lake 91 47. The Professor Studies a Coat 93 48. Too Late 95 49. Sergeant Reynolds’s Theory 97 50. Daylight Robbery 99 51. A Simple Solution 101 52. Who? 103 53. Murder in the Swamp 105 54. Death by Drowning 107 55. Tragedy at the Convention 109 56. A Murderer’s Mistake 111 57. Babe Comes Through 113 58. A Soldier of Fortune 115 59. Number Twenty-Six 117 60. The Pullman Car Murder 121 61. Forgery 123 62. The Christmas Eve Tragedy 125 63. A Knight of the Bath 127 64. Murder in the First Degree 129 65. A Rendezvous with Death 131 66. A Rum Regatta 133 67. Who is the Heir? 135 68. The Professor Stops a Blunder 137 69. The Perfect Crime 139 70. The Professor Sees Through It 141 71. The Kidnapers’ Cleverness 143 Solutions 145 IT STANDS TO REASON! A NEW NATIONAL GAME Here is a fascinating game of wits for a party of any size. It can be played in either of two ways. 1. Select one or more stories from the _Minute Mysteries_ that particularly appeal to you. Make as many copies of each as there are guests at the party. Then pass the copies around and allow three minutes, say, for your guests to study them. At the end of this time each must hand you a written solution, giving the line of reasoning which was used. You compare these with the solutions at the back of the book; the one who is most often correct is the winner. 2. Instead of making copies of each story, you may read it aloud, slowly and carefully. If any of the listeners so desire, it may be read a second time. But after this no questions may be asked. After